CDC/FDA smoking gun of smoking guns

• They confess: that they had no virus once they concocted the take a look at for the virus; they “contrived” a mannequin by pretending to seek out what they needed to seek out
• That is the con and the crime that drove thousands and thousands of lives, and economies, into wreck


Quiz: If an company of the federal authorities revealed that they had no foundation for establishing a diagnostic take a look at that was used on thousands and thousands of individuals; however the take a look at was the cornerstone of a nationwide lockdown; and the lockdown drove the financial system off a cliff; and destroyed thousands and thousands of lives; nevertheless, NOW, that company says, they DO have a foundation for the take a look at; would you purchase what they’re promoting?

In case your reply is sure, you’re in good firm; the corporate I name Blind, Ignorant, Denialist, Hoaxing Journalists.

The CDC issued a doc that bulges with devastating admissions.

The discharge is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:

“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”

Many individuals consider this implies the CDC is giving up on the PCR take a look at as a method of “detecting the virus.” The CDC isn’t saying that in any respect.

They’re saying the PCR know-how will proceed for use, however they’re changing what the take a look at is wanting FOR with a greater “reference sample.” A greater marker. A greater goal. A greater piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

CDC/FDA are confessing there was a PROBLEM with the PCR take a look at which has been used to detect the virus, beginning in February of 2020—-right as much as this minute.

In different phrases, the thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of “COVID cases” based mostly on the PCR take a look at in use are all suspect. Truly, that assertion is just too beneficiant. Each take a look at results of each PCR take a look at needs to be thrown out.

To verify this, the CDC doc hyperlinks to an FDA launch titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here’s a killer quote:

“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

Translation: We, on the CDC, didn’t have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus after we concocted the PCR take a look at for SARS-CoV-2. Sure, it’s unbelievable, proper? And that’s the take a look at we’ve been utilizing all alongside. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up (invented) artificial gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE near the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, with out having the faintest thought of what we have been doing, as a result of, once more, we didn’t have an precise specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS one thing referred to as SARS-CoV-2.

This wonderful FDA doc goes to say the Company has granted emergency approval to 59 totally different PCR checks because the starting of the (pretend) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

Translation: Every of the 59 totally different PCR checks for SARS-CoV-2 advised totally different lies and concocted totally different fabrications concerning the genetic make-up of the virus—-the virus we didn’t have. Clearly, then, these checks would give unreliable outcomes. THE PCR TESTS USED CONTRIVED SPECIMENS OF THE VIRUS WE DIDN’T HAVE.

BUT, don’t fear, be blissful, as a result of NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they actually do have precise virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from sufferers; they’ve higher targets for the PCR take a look at, and labs ought to begin gearing up for the brand new and improved checks.

In different phrases, they have been mendacity THEN, however they’re not mendacity NOW. They have been “contriving,” however now they’re telling the reality.

In the event you consider that, I’ve Fountain of Youth water on the market, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.

Right here, as soon as once more, I report virology’s model of “we isolated the virus”:

They’ve a soup they make of their labs.

This soup comprises human and monkey cells, poisonous chemical compounds and medicines, and all kinds of different random genetic materials. As a result of the cells begin to die, the researchers ASSUME a little bit of mucus from a affected person they dropped within the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS should be the killer agent within the mucus.

This assumption is solely unwarranted. The medicine and chemical compounds may very well be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are additionally ravenous the cells of significant vitamins, and that hunger might kill the cells.

There isn’t any proof that SARS-CoV-2 is within the soup, or that it’s doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.

But the researchers name cell-death “isolation of the virus.”

To say this can be a non-sequitur is an enormous understatement. Of their universe, “We assume, without proof, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”

Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.” Apart from that, it’s good.


(The hyperlink to this text posted on my weblog is right here—with sources.)

(Observe me on Gab and/or Twitter at @jonrappoport)

Jon Rappoport — Bio and Archives

The writer of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat within the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting follow for personal purchasers, the aim of which is the growth of non-public inventive energy. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has labored as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medication, and well being for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Journal, Stern, and different newspapers and magazines within the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on world politics, well being, logic, and inventive energy to audiences all over the world. You’ll be able to join his free NoMoreFakeNews emails right hereor his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails right here.

Welcome to CFP’s Remark Part!

Pricey Canada Free Press Commenters. We’re organising our new system now. We’re engaged on the registration coding now. Feedback might be accomplished presently as a “Guest”.

Thank You on your loyalty and readership of Canada Free Press!

Click on to see our Commenting Coverage

CFP Feedback

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.